| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Add stubdomain support
On 11/2/08 19:21, "Samuel Thibault" <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> You hack the libxc headers a bit: is this because you need different
>> definitions of certain things in minios environment (seems unlikely for
>> things like memory barriers and page sizes) or because of namespace
>> conflicts?
>
> Conflicts. Actually they get defined to the same things... Maybe we
> could have these go to public Xen headers so as to be simply shared.
It's not really for Xen to define processor-architectural stuff. I'd rather
just clean up libxc's namespace usage. Or perhaps it is more appropriate to
clean up stubdom's -- it's private architectural definitions shouldn't be
leaking into code that includes stubdom's public high-level headers. libxc's
namespace should largely be its own playground.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home