WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] hibernation (suspend to disk) ?

To: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] hibernation (suspend to disk) ?
From: "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:36:03 -0800
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:36:43 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <474EFF74.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <474EF6B8.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx><C3749A60.192BC%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <474EFF74.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acgyqhc1WT4ajOjPSO2mi11ud6m0PwAAB1ww
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] hibernation (suspend to disk) ?
Hibernation (typically ACPI S4, or suspend to disk) is _not_ expected to
work. 

For S4, dom0 additionally needs to save the memory image to disk. 

Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center


-----Original Message-----
From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jan Beulich
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 9:06 AM
To: Keir Fraser
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] hibernation (suspend to disk) ?

But I asked about suspend to disk...

>>> Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 29.11.07 17:33 >>>
Domains don't need to be saved. They continue to reside in RAM across
S3.

 -- Keir

On 29/11/07 16:28, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> With the ACPI S-state patches in, is it expected that hibernation is
working
> (along with suspend to RAM), even in the presence of active DomU-s
(i.e.
> are all the scripts hooked up so that guests get saved before Dom0
goes
> to sleep)?
> 
> Thanks, Jan
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel 




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>