 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] hibernation (suspend to disk) ?
| To: | <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] hibernation (suspend to disk) ? |
| From: | "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:28:24 +0000 |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:27:47 -0800 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
With the ACPI S-state patches in, is it expected that hibernation is working (along with suspend to RAM), even in the presence of active DomU-s (i.e. are all the scripts hooked up so that guests get saved before Dom0 goes to sleep)? Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Page tables in Xen, Daniel Stodden |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] hibernation (suspend to disk) ?, Keir Fraser |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] consolidate xsm processing within domain control hypercall, Mike D. Day |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] hibernation (suspend to disk) ?, Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
