| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] behaviour of 'xm block-attach' changed with 3.1.2?
Hmmm... I actually remember querying why I could do consecutive 'xm
block-attach' operations on a device without any warning being given,
but I can't find the original email. I guess someone fixed it in
response to that but didn't allow the '!' to override it.
James
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, 25 November 2007 20:10
> To: James Harper; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] behaviour of 'xm block-attach' changed with
> 3.1.2?
>
> The behaviour isn't supposed to have changed. If it has between 3.1.1
and
> 3.1.2 then it should be easy to track down as there aren't that many
> changesets.
>
> -- Keir
>
> On 25/11/07 01:31, "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
> > 'xm block-attach' doesn't let me assign the same backend device
anymore,
> > even if I use 'r!' or 'w!'.
> >
> > I think this has changed since 3.1.1 (or maybe since 3.1.0).
> >
> > Is this the way it is supposed to work?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > James
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home