 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] behaviour of 'xm block-attach' changed with 3.1.2?
| To: | <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] behaviour of 'xm block-attach' changed with 3.1.2? |
| From: | "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 25 Nov 2007 12:31:08 +1100 |
| Delivery-date: | Sat, 24 Nov 2007 17:32:35 -0800 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcgvAtqAwHj6tdolTbWuS6v0qtVCDA== |
| Thread-topic: | behaviour of 'xm block-attach' changed with 3.1.2? |
'xm block-attach' doesn't let me assign the same backend device anymore, even if I use 'r!' or 'w!'. I think this has changed since 3.1.1 (or maybe since 3.1.0). Is this the way it is supposed to work? Thanks James _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] Invoking blkback_probe, Kaushikb |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] [VTD][PATCH] Fix iommu_map_page(), Han, Weidong |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Invoking blkback_probe, Kaushikb |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] behaviour of 'xm block-attach' changed with 3.1.2?, Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
