On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 06:36:17AM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 27/9/07 21:40, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >> Unstable, but not 3.1.1, also has
> >>
> >> http://xenbits2.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg?rev/207582c8d88b
> >>
> >> I did a little testing on a 3.1-based system that includes the above c/s
> >> and your reversion of c/s 15124. No problems noticed testing create,
> >> new, reboot, save, restore. Did not test migration or hvm guests. So
> >> perhaps reverting 15124 is fine for unstable but not sure about 3.1.1
> >> *without* c/s 15642.
> >
> > Yep, I just tested 3.1.1 with 15124 reverted, and 15642 applied and it copes
> > with the use cases I have. So I'd reckon on making those two changes to the
> > 3.1-testing tree would be sufficient.
>
> Is this still wanted? Masaki Kanno's response seems to indicate there are
> still issues.
I need to try and reproduce Masaki's results & figure out what's missing.
We definitely need some form of patch, because as it stands two important
use cases are broken for xen-3.1-testing - provisioning of new VMs wit the
virt-install tool being one of them. I'd rather reduce the strictness of
name uniqueness checks to be too leniant than be too strict and break things
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home