[Xen-devel] RE: linux-2.6.18 c/s 42 and blocktap

To:	"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] RE: linux-2.6.18 c/s 42 and blocktap
From:	"Yu, Ke" <ke.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:15:18 +0800
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Thu, 21 Jun 2007 02:14:10 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<467A54EA.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	Acez31Wrlj25zOSbRdWUiHY1PRCulQABOz5A
Thread-topic:	linux-2.6.18 c/s 42 and blocktap

Jan Beulich  wrote on 2007年6月21日 16:38:
> Is there a particular reason why the change to blkback.c isn't also
> needed for blktap.c?
> 
> Thanks, Jan

Oh, yes, it is also needed for blktap.c. We did not use blktap when doing S3 
suspend/resume, so forget this. 
Will add it later. Thanks for pointing out.

Regards
Ke

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] RE: linux-2.6.18 c/s 42 and blocktap