|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [VTD][patch 0/5] HVM device assignment using vt-d
On 31/5/07 16:59, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Agree to support both with a common infrastructure.
We don't need both! Let's look at which is cleanest and/or fastest and make
a judgment call.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] [VTD][patch 0/5] HVM device assignment using vt-d, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] [VTD][patch 0/5] HVM device assignment using vt-d, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [VTD][patch 0/5] HVM device assignment using vt-d, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] [VTD][patch 0/5] HVM device assignment using vt-d, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [VTD][patch 0/5] HVM device assignment using vt-d, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] [VTD][patch 0/5] HVM device assignment using vt-d, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [VTD][patch 0/5] HVM device assignment using vt-d, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] [VTD][patch 0/5] HVM device assignment using vt-d, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [VTD][patch 0/5] HVM device assignment using vt-d, Tian, Kevin
- RE: [Xen-devel] [VTD][patch 0/5] HVM device assignment using vt-d, Tian, Kevin
- RE: [Xen-devel] [VTD][patch 0/5] HVM device assignment using vt-d, Guy Zana
- Re: [Xen-devel] [VTD][patch 0/5] HVM device assignment using vt-d,
Keir Fraser <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] [VTD][patch 0/5] HVM device assignment using vt-d, Tian, Kevin
- RE: [Xen-devel] [VTD][patch 0/5] HVM device assignment using vt-d, Guy Zana
- RE: [Xen-devel] [VTD][patch 0/5] HVM device assignment using vt-d, Kay, Allen M
- RE: [Xen-devel] [VTD][patch 0/5] HVM device assignment using vt-d, Guy Zana
- RE: [Xen-devel] [VTD][patch 0/5] HVM device assignment using vt-d, Kay, Allen M
|
|
|
|
|