| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel][Xense-devel][PATCH][3/4] Xen Security Modules: tools
> There are two styles we properly support: Xen style as in files like
> event_channel.c, xmalloc.c, etc.; and Linux style (generally seen in files
> ripped off fairly directly from Linux -- *not* used in new files). The
> halfway-house files usually arise from me having been too lazy to enforce
> Xen style when they were checked in, and generally being in bits of the
> tree where I don't often venture.
I did wonder if it was something like that ;-)
> Seeing as we're planning to be more strict from now on, the current ACM
> code style is *not* to be followed.
Cool, thanks for the clarification. I'll continue running the verifier over
new patches and I can submit it for inclusion in 3.0.6 - once I've finished
teaching it the difference between Xen and Linux. Then folks will be able to
run it over submitted code as a sanity test.
Cheers,
Mark
--
Dave: Just a question. What use is a unicyle with no seat? And no pedals!
Mark: To answer a question with a question: What use is a skateboard?
Dave: Skateboards have wheels.
Mark: My wheel has a wheel!
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home