|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?
* Ryan Harper <ryanh@xxxxxxxxxx> [2007-05-04 08:34]:
> * Subrahmanian, Raj <raj.subrahmanian@xxxxxxxxxx> [2007-05-04 01:23]:
> > Ryan,
> > I did check out the mail discussion where you encountered and fixed
> > this.
> > I am seeing this again on 15009, unstable and in 15021 3.1. rc7.
> > I have included the debug messages in both runs.
>
> Hrm, well, we need to see which node the request is failing in so we can
> figure out how to initialize the heap. I'm attaching a patch that
> should hopefully dump out which node the memory request is failing in.
>
> Last time, it was the xmalloc() in xen/common/page_alloc.c in
> init_heap_pages().
>
> Give this patch a spin and email me the output.
Here is one that actually compiles.
--
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
(512) 838-9253 T/L: 678-9253
ryanh@xxxxxxxxxx
numa_debug.patch
Description: Text document
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-staging] [xen-3.1-testing] xend: Fix use ofPIFIsPhysical (takes no arguments)., Krysan, Susan
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-staging] [xen-3.1-testing] xend: Fix use ofPIFIsPhysical (takes no arguments)., Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?, Subrahmanian, Raj
- Re: [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?, Ryan Harper
- RE: [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?, Subrahmanian, Raj
- RE: [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?, Subrahmanian, Raj
- Re: [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?, Ryan Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?,
Ryan Harper <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?, Subrahmanian, Raj
- RE: [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?, Subrahmanian, Raj
- Re: [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?, Ryan Harper
|
|
|
|
|