|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?
* Subrahmanian, Raj <raj.subrahmanian@xxxxxxxxxx> [2007-05-04 01:23]:
> Ryan,
> I did check out the mail discussion where you encountered and fixed
> this.
> I am seeing this again on 15009, unstable and in 15021 3.1. rc7.
> I have included the debug messages in both runs.
Hrm, well, we need to see which node the request is failing in so we can
figure out how to initialize the heap. I'm attaching a patch that
should hopefully dump out which node the memory request is failing in.
Last time, it was the xmalloc() in xen/common/page_alloc.c in
init_heap_pages().
Give this patch a spin and email me the output.
I'd also be interested in your SRAT table output for this machine.
--
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
(512) 838-9253 T/L: 678-9253
ryanh@xxxxxxxxxx
numa_debug.patch
Description: Text document
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-staging] [xen-3.1-testing] xend: Fix use ofPIFIsPhysical (takes no arguments)., Krysan, Susan
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-staging] [xen-3.1-testing] xend: Fix use ofPIFIsPhysical (takes no arguments)., Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?, Subrahmanian, Raj
- Re: [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?, Ryan Harper
- RE: [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?, Subrahmanian, Raj
- RE: [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?, Subrahmanian, Raj
- Re: [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?,
Ryan Harper <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?, Ryan Harper
- RE: [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?, Subrahmanian, Raj
- RE: [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?, Subrahmanian, Raj
- Re: [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?, Ryan Harper
|
|
|
|
|