|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch 21/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Use the hvc	console 
 
| 
To:  | 
Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>,	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Subject:  | 
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch 21/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Use the hvc	console infrastructure for Xen console | 
 
| 
From:  | 
Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Date:  | 
Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:28:41 +0000 | 
 
| 
Cc:  | 
Zachary Amsden <zach@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,	virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Delivery-date:  | 
Fri, 16 Mar 2007 02:27:55 -0700 | 
 
| 
Envelope-to:  | 
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
In-reply-to:  | 
<20070316085451.GE23174@xxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
List-help:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> | 
 
| 
List-id:  | 
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-post:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-subscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> | 
 
| 
List-unsubscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> | 
 
| 
Sender:  | 
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
Thread-index:  | 
AcdnrXv0umK08tOgEduhtwAX8io7RQ== | 
 
| 
Thread-topic:  | 
[Xen-devel] Re: [patch 21/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Use the hvc	console infrastructure for Xen console | 
 
| 
User-agent:  | 
Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620 | 
 
 
 
On 16/3/07 08:54, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> + prod = intf->in_prod;
>> + mb();
>> + BUG_ON((prod - cons) > sizeof(intf->in));
> 
> such mb()'s are typically a sign of "i have no clear idea what SMP
> serialization rules apply here, but something is needed because
> otherwise it breaks" ?
These mb()'s are pretty standard for lock-free producer/consumer rings.
Write descriptor /then/ write the updated producer. Read the producer /then/
read any descriptors revealed by this new producer value.
All our ring protocols (and we have a few) require memory barriers. Those
that use our standard set of ring macros have the memory barriers hidden
from view, but they're still there.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |