WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-changelog] [xen-unstable] [PV-ON-HVM] Don't generat

To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Steven Smith" <sos22@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-changelog] [xen-unstable] [PV-ON-HVM] Don't generate lots ofspurious interrupts when using event
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 23:27:00 +0800
Delivery-date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 13:58:10 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acb9E8efr3DWOEKmRFGJcJXAn0WE2wAtFA8Q
Thread-topic: [Xen-changelog] [xen-unstable] [PV-ON-HVM] Don't generate lots ofspurious interrupts when using event
Hi, Steven,
        This does solve the problem, however it adds unnecessary overhead 
(one more trap into xen at the end of each event handler). IMO, the real 
cause should be in pic_intack, where pending irr is converted into isr. For 
normal interrupts issued from qemu, only edge triggered interrupt gets irr 
bit cleared here and level triggered case waits until de-assert occurring on 
virtual interrupt line. However for callback irq triggered by xen itself, 
there's no need to emulate such wave because we inject to vpic/vioapic 
directly instead of by virq line. It's just an event, or a message though 
described as level by virtual platform. So how about following alternative:

diff -r 874cc0ff214d xen/arch/x86/hvm/i8259.c
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/i8259.c  Wed Nov 01 09:55:43 2006 +0000
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/i8259.c  Wed Nov 01 23:16:24 2006 +0800
@@ -208,6 +208,9 @@ static inline void pic_intack(PicState *
     /* We don't clear a level sensitive interrupt here */
     if (!(s->elcr & (1 << irq)))
         s->irr &= ~(1 << irq);
+
+    /* Clear xen issued interrupt */
+    s->irr_xen &= ~(1 << irq);
 }

 static int pic_read_irq(struct hvm_virpic *s)
diff -r 874cc0ff214d xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/io.c
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/io.c Wed Nov 01 09:55:43 2006 +0000
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/io.c Wed Nov 01 23:16:24 2006 +0800
@@ -116,8 +116,8 @@ asmlinkage void vmx_intr_assist(void)
         int callback_irq;
         callback_irq =
             v->domain->arch.hvm_domain.params[HVM_PARAM_CALLBACK_IRQ];
-        if ( callback_irq != 0 )
-            pic_set_xen_irq(pic, callback_irq, local_events_need_delivery());
+        if ( callback_irq != 0 && local_events_need_delivery())
+            pic_set_xen_irq(pic, callback_irq, 1);
     }

     if ( vlapic && vlapic_enabled(vlapic) && vlapic->flush_tpr_threshold )
     
By this way, we can also avoid bunch of unnecessary pic operations 
when there's no event pending when resuming to guest.

Actually irr_xen can be extended to support future hvm driver domain, 
which is the same case that xen injects to vpic/vioapic directly when 
receiving hardware interrupt. There's even no chance to emulate a 
de-assert in such case.

Thanks,
Kevin

>>From: Xen patchbot-unstable
>Sent: 2006年11月1日 1:40
>
># HG changeset patch
># User Steven Smith <ssmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
># Node ID 79a40acadb41fbe5e5b88b20de5fe53f4dd6b413
># Parent  b2371c9e05f5146767464db8504214ae2b77c25c
>[PV-ON-HVM] Don't generate lots of spurious interrupts when using
>event
>channel upcalls.
>
>The issue here was that the Xen platform PCI interrupt is only updated
>when you return from the hypervisor into guest context, and so remained
>asserted for a short interval after the interrupt handler ran.  If
>it happened that the first subsequent trap to the hypervisor was
>for unmasking the 8259 interrupt again, the unmasking caused the
>interrupt
>to be reinjected.  This caused an edge on the chaining interrupt from
>the slave PIC to the master.  The platform interrupt on the slave
>would then be cleared as we returned to the guest, and so you
>eventually end up injecting an interrupt on the master chained
>interrupt with nothing pending on the slave, which shows up as
>a spurious interrupt in the guest.
>
>Signed-off-by: Steven Smith <sos22@xxxxxxxxx>
>---
> unmodified_drivers/linux-2.6/platform-pci/evtchn.c |    8 +++++++-
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff -r b2371c9e05f5 -r 79a40acadb41
>unmodified_drivers/linux-2.6/platform-pci/evtchn.c
>--- a/unmodified_drivers/linux-2.6/platform-pci/evtchn.c       Tue Oct 31
>11:31:34 2006 +0000
>+++ b/unmodified_drivers/linux-2.6/platform-pci/evtchn.c       Tue Oct 31
>11:38:55 2006 +0000
>@@ -167,11 +167,17 @@ irqreturn_t evtchn_interrupt(int irq, vo
>                       l2 = s->evtchn_pending[l1i] & ~s->evtchn_mask[l1i];
>               }
>       }
>+
>+      /* Make sure the hypervisor has a chance to notice that the
>+         upcall_pending condition has been cleared, so that we don't
>+         try and reinject the interrupt again. */
>+        (void)HYPERVISOR_xen_version(0, NULL);
>+
>       return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> void force_evtchn_callback(void)
> {
>-      evtchn_interrupt(0, NULL, NULL);
>+        (void)HYPERVISOR_xen_version(0, NULL);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(force_evtchn_callback);
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-changelog mailing list
>Xen-changelog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-changelog

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel