>
>Content-Description: xm-test_x86_64.patch
>> diff -r b3d94f4ddffe tools/xm-test/lib/XmTestReport/arch.py
>> --- a/tools/xm-test/lib/XmTestReport/arch.py Sat Oct 28 11:30:38 2006
>> +++ b/tools/xm-test/lib/XmTestReport/arch.py Wed Nov 1 10:07:20 2006
>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>> "i486" : "x86",
>> "i586" : "x86",
>> "i686" : "x86",
>> + "x86_64" : "x86_64",
>> "ia64" : "ia64",
>> "ppc" : "powerpc",
>> "ppc64" : "powerpc",
>> @@ -35,6 +36,9 @@
>>
>> _arch = _uname_to_arch_map.get(os.uname()[4], "Unknown")
>> if _arch == "x86":
>> + cpuValues = {"model_name" : "Unknown",
>> + "flags" : "Unknown"}
>> +elif _arch == "x86_64":
>> cpuValues = {"model_name" : "Unknown",
>> "flags" : "Unknown"}
>> elif _arch == "ia64":
>
>Stefan Berger has already submitted these fixes -- I'm applying them
right now.
>
>> diff -r b3d94f4ddffe tools/xm-test/runtest.sh
>> --- a/tools/xm-test/runtest.sh Sat Oct 28 11:30:38 2006
>> +++ b/tools/xm-test/runtest.sh Wed Nov 1 10:07:20 2006
>> @@ -78,7 +78,13 @@
>> eval $(./lib/XmTestReport/xmtest.py)
>> ARCH=$(uname -m | sed -e s/i.86/i386/ -e
's/ppc\(64\)*/powerpc/')
>> rrdver="initrd-${XM_TEST_MAJ}.${XM_TEST_MIN}-${ARCH}.img"
>> - if [ "$realrd" != "$rrdver" ]; then
>> + exp_flag=0
>> + realarch=`echo $realrd | awk -F- '{print $3}' | awk -F. '{print
$1}'`
>> + rrdarch=`echo $rrdver | awk -F- '{print $3}' | awk -F. '{print
$1}'`
>> + if [ "$realarch" = "i386" -a "$rrdarch" = "x86_64" ]; then
>> + exp_flag=1
>> + fi
>> + if [ $exp_flag -eq 0 -a "$realrd" != "$rrdver" ]; then
>> echo "Error: ramdisk/initrd.img is from an old version, or is
not for this "
>> echo "architecture ($ARCH)."
>> echo "You need to build a ramdisk from at least
${XM_TEST_MAJ}.${XM_TEST_MIN}"
>
>I see from this that you're just using the i386 ramdisk on x86_64 as
well.
>Stefan also has an RFC out for making a real x86_64 ramdisk, so perhaps
you
>might be interested in that thread, entitled "enable building of
xm-test
>suite' buildroot environment on x86-64".
>
>For now, I'll take your patch to use the 32-bit ramdisk, and we can see
about
>getting a proper 64-bit one built afterwards.
Thanks your comments. For 64-bits platform, both 32 bits and 64 bits
ramdisk
should be supported, so this patch will work even 64 bits ramdisk is
available.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Ewan.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home