On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 04:01:42PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 10/10/06 15:56, "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > btw, is the process of merging patches from email being done completely
> > manually? git certainly has really good pull-from-email scripts that
> > avoid this sort of oversight, but I'm not sure hg is quite so well
> > equipped.
>
> Usually patches are applied as a whole unit using 'patch', even if they have
> to be manually extracted from the email. Looks like Andy might have done
> this one by hand and got it wrong!
On that note, _please_ can people submit patches
1. as attachments,
2. with a text/plain MIME type, and preferably
3. using hg export with a decent comment and a Signed-off-by: line in place.
It makes life a lot easier!
If your mailer doesn't do text/plain attachments properly, and for some reason
you still want to use such a broken heap of four-ex, then the next best thing
is plain-text inline in the message (because most people can't review patches
very easily if your mailer has sent it as an octet-stream).
Thanks,
Ewan.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home