 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective?
| To: | "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective? |
| From: | "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:30:12 +0800 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 11 Aug 2006 21:31:34 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | Aca9yABevSNKoKxKQoeZHIOaybJ/tw== |
| Thread-topic: | Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective? |
hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 seem not effective, should we use vmmcall instead since hvmloader is running in none-root vmcs mode? Thanks -Xin _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] [NET] front: Restore 16 bytes of reservation, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] Re: Sparc32/64 porting effort, interest?, Pete Zaitcev |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [NET] front: Restore 16 bytes of reservation, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective?, Steven Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
