WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/

Home

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

[Xen-devel] Re: [1/4] [NET] back: Fix maximum fragment check

from [Keir Fraser]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] Re: [1/4] [NET] back: Fix maximum fragment check
From:	Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 1 Jul 2006 09:17:19 +0100
Cc:	Xen Development Mailing List <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Sat, 01 Jul 2006 01:24:08 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20060701032609.GA29803@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<20060629124614.GA21911@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <e9220840c1d7241f72f58c1771c74d40@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060629132608.GA22343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <bd7d2589ed6bff8876dbfe4790244fb0@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060629230834.GA26561@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060630024047.GA29185@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060630124703.GA23466@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <69ce918a310b3e9597230c7d8521eed3@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060630132141.GA23719@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6119c0c588ef3a01c19119bda86298fd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060701032609.GA29803@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


On 1 Jul 2006, at 04:26, Herbert Xu wrote:

I'm not too bothered either way, but I personally prefer having the
more properly qualified names listed under feature-gso. Pulling it
apart with strstr() in netfront (for each proto that netfront can deal
with) wouldn't be hard.


I can call it feature-gso-tcpv4, feature-gso-udpv4, etc.


Yes, I like that.

 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] Re: [1/4] [NET] back: Fix maximum fragment check, Keir Fraser <= [Xen-devel] Re: [1/4] [NET] back: Fix maximum fragment check, Keir Fraser [Xen-devel] Re: [1/4] [NET] back: Fix maximum fragment check, Herbert Xu [Xen-devel] Re: [1/4] [NET] back: Fix maximum fragment check, Keir Fraser [Xen-devel] Re: [1/4] [NET] back: Fix maximum fragment check, Herbert Xu [Xen-devel] [1/4] [NET] back: Fix off-by-one error in netbk_tx_err, Herbert Xu [Xen-devel] Re: [1/4] [NET] back: Fix off-by-one error in netbk_tx_err, Keir Fraser [Xen-devel] Re: [1/4] [NET] back: Fix off-by-one error in netbk_tx_err, Herbert Xu [Xen-devel] [2/4] [NET] back: Add GSO features field and check gso_size, Herbert Xu [Xen-devel] [3/4] [NET]: Rename feature-tso to feature-gso-tcpv4, Herbert Xu [Xen-devel] [4/4] [NET] front: Zero negotiated bits in xen_set_features, Herbert Xu

Next by Date:	[Xen-devel] Re: [1/4] [NET] back: Fix maximum fragment check, Keir Fraser
Next by Thread:	[Xen-devel] Re: [1/4] [NET] back: Fix maximum fragment check, Keir Fraser
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

This site is hosted by Citrix