WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] VTx enabled + xen 3.0 stable IO performance...

To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] VTx enabled + xen 3.0 stable IO performance...
From: "M S, Rajanish" <MS.Rajanish@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 13:03:54 -0400
Delivery-date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 10:04:22 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcaKVFuFs3a6jo8OQCOvU5LBkGo0ZQ==
Thread-topic: VTx enabled + xen 3.0 stable IO performance...

Hi,

 

   Is there any IO performance results for Xen3.0.2 stable + VT enabled full virtualization? Our tests shows 100,000 IOPs on Native linux(2.6.16) vs 75000 IOPs on domain 0 for the same kernel version for 512B IO size. Is this expected behavior? Xen document says that the performance should be close-to-native.

 

  Also, it will be helpful if you could point us to any performance results of Xen 3.0.

 

Thanks.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>