xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Xenoprof passive domain support

from [Ray Bryant]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Xenoprof passive domain support
From:	"Ray Bryant" <raybry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 25 May 2006 13:52:40 -0500
Cc:	"Yang, Xiaowei" <xiaowei.yang@xxxxxxxxx>, "Santos, Jose Renato G" <joserenato.santos@xxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Thu, 25 May 2006 11:53:13 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<2BF508F394C196468CCBEC031320DCDFEE003B@pdsmsx405>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<2BF508F394C196468CCBEC031320DCDFEE003B@pdsmsx405>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	KMail/1.8

Xiaowei,

Do you have a more recent patch for this?   I'm having a hard time sorting out 
the rejects, particularly the ones related to xenoprof-generic.patch.  (I'm 
working against change set 10031.)  Renato sent me something called 
xenoprof3.patch (could have been his name for this patch), but that could 
have just been his name for it.

Particularly confusing are the changes related to CPU_MODE_XEN in 
add_kernel_ctx_swtich().   There's no case statement there at all anymore, 
just an "if (in_kernel)" statement.  And all I find in oprofile.h are 
#defines's for CPU_IS_KERNEL, CPU_TRACE_BEGIN...

Any help would be appreciated.

Which change set were your patches of 4/28 against?

-- 
Ray Bryant
AMD Performance Labs                   Austin, Tx
512-602-0038 (o)                 512-507-7807 (c)


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Xenoprof passive domain support, Ray Bryant <= RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Xenoprof passive domain support, Yang, Xiaowei

Previous by Date:	RE: [Xen-devel] windows user mode debugging under xen, Nakajima, Jun
Next by Date:	Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] [3/3] dom0_ops explicitly sized types, Hollis Blanchard
Previous by Thread:	[Xen-devel] [RFC][PATCH] Allow privcmd to support the _compat hypercalls, Anthony Liguori
Next by Thread:	RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Xenoprof passive domain support, Yang, Xiaowei
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]