WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] make evtchn_upcall_pending arch-specific type

To: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] make evtchn_upcall_pending arch-specific type
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:46:28 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:47:31 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200603301313.44384.hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200603301313.44384.hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 30 Mar 2006, at 20:13, Hollis Blanchard wrote:

evtchn_upcall_pending is another variable that bitops are used on, so PowerPC wants it to be a long. Unfortunately, it's also part of the guest/hypervisor interface, so we can't change it for architectures with existing guests.

Compile-tested on x86(-32). Please apply.

Before going down this route, what about just casting the field to long, since it is actually aligned on a suitable boundary, as it happens? And what will your solution be for fields in grant_entry structure? That's another one where the fields to be atomically updated are at least 8-byte aligned, and where using longer types will bloat a structure that we'd prefer to pack nicely.

If this is the best way for ppc then I think atomic_bit_t would be a nicer typedef.

 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>