WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] no member named `proto_csum_blank'

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] no member named `proto_csum_blank'
From: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:30:21 +0900
Delivery-date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:42:15 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126
I'm wondering what the reasoning behind the following hunk of
8706:fd9b2c1bb577. 

changeset: Update linux sparse tree to subarch layout.

--- a/linux-2.6-xen-sparse/include/linux/skbuff.h       Mon Jan 30 12:35:43 2006
+++ b/linux-2.6-xen-sparse/include/linux/skbuff.h       Mon Jan 30 17:18:27 2006
@@ -254,8 +254,10 @@
        unsigned char           local_df,
                                cloned:1,
                                nohdr:1,
+#ifdef CONFIG_XEN
                                proto_csum_valid:1,
                                proto_csum_blank:1,
+#endif
                                pkt_type,
                                ip_summed;
        __u32                   priority;

It currently causes the following build failure (on x86_64).

net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_nat_proto_tcp.c: In function `tcp_manip_pkt':
net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_nat_proto_tcp.c:132: error: structure has no member named 
`proto_csum_blank'

Is it safe to reverse this change?

-- 
Horms

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Xen-devel] no member named `proto_csum_blank', Horms <=