|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching
|
To: |
Zachary Amsden <zach@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching |
|
From: |
Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:06:27 -0800 |
|
Cc: |
Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, Christopher Li <chrisl@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pratap Subrahmanyam <pratap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wim Coekaerts <wim.coekaerts@xxxxxxxxxx>, Joshua LeVasseur <jtl@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dan Hecht <dhecht@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, Jack Lo <jlo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>, Anne Holler <anne@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jyothy Reddy <jreddy@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kip Macy <kmacy@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ky Srinivasan <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Leendert van Doorn <leendert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dan Arai <arai@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Thu, 23 Mar 2006 18:07:53 +0000 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<4421F1AD.1070108@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<200603131802.k2DI2nv8005665@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200603222115.46926.ak@xxxxxxx> <20060322214025.GJ15997@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4421CCA8.4080702@xxxxxxxxxx> <20060322225117.GM15997@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4421DF62.8020903@xxxxxxxxxx> <20060323004136.GR15997@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4421F1AD.1070108@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
* Zachary Amsden (zach@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> No, you don't need to dream up all the possible interface bits ahead of
> time. With a la carte interfaces, you can take what you need now, and
> add features later. You don't need an ABI for features. You need it
> for compatibility. You will need to update the hypervisor ABI. And you
> can't force people to upgrade their kernels.
How do you support an interface that's not already a part of the ABI
w/out changing the kernel?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, (continued)
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Zachary Amsden
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Daniel Arai
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Chris Wright
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Chris Wright
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Zachary Amsden
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Chris Wright
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Zachary Amsden
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching,
Chris Wright <=
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Zachary Amsden
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Joshua LeVasseur
|
|
|
Home