|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching
|
To: |
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching |
|
From: |
Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:40:06 -0800 |
|
Cc: |
Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christopher Li <chrisl@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wim Coekaerts <wim.coekaerts@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>, Anne Holler <anne@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jyothy Reddy <jreddy@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kip Macy <kmacy@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ky Srinivasan <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Leendert van Doorn <leendert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:41:06 +0000 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<4421EC44.7010500@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<200603131802.k2DI2nv8005665@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200603222115.46926.ak@xxxxxxx> <20060322214025.GJ15997@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4421EC44.7010500@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
* Anthony Liguori (aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Would you have less trouble if the "ROM" were actually more like a
> module? Specifically, if it had a proper elf header and symbol table,
> used symbols as entry points, and was a GPL interface (so that ROM's had
> to be GPL)? Then it's just a kernel module that's hidden in the option
> ROM space and has a C interface.
Yeah, point is the interface is normal C API, and has the similar free
form that normal kernel API's have.
thanks,
-chris
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, (continued)
[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Jan Engelhardt
[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Andi Kleen
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Chris Wright
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Anthony Liguori
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching,
Chris Wright <=
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Zachary Amsden
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Eli Collins
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Stefan Berger
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Zachary Amsden
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Anthony Liguori
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Zachary Amsden
[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Zachary Amsden
[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Daniel Arai
[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching, Chris Wright
|
|
|
Home