|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interfac
|
To: |
Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal |
|
From: |
Zachary Amsden <zach@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Tue, 14 Mar 2006 08:22:23 -0800 |
|
Cc: |
Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, Joshua LeVasseur <jtl@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pratap Subrahmanyam <pratap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wim Coekaerts <wim.coekaerts@xxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx>, Jack Lo <jlo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dan Hecht <dhecht@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christopher Li <chrisl@xxxxxxxxxx>, Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>, Anne Holler <anne@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jyothy Reddy <jreddy@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kip Macy <kmacy@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ky Srinivasan <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Leendert van Doorn <leendert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dan Arai <arai@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:13:56 +0000 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<Pine.LNX.4.63.0603140742530.31791@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<200603131758.k2DHwQM7005618@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <441642EE.80900@xxxxxxxxxx> <4416460A.2090704@xxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0603132329160.17874@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <441658A2.4090905@xxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0603140742530.31791@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) |
Rik van Riel wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Zachary Amsden wrote:
There is a Signed-off-by line on every patch I send out,
You're right. It was just the first 1/24 that was missing it,
it was there in the second copy.
BTW, I have no idea why the first 1/24 was missing it. I checked right
before sending, and it was there - perhaps I forgot to save my changes.
The second copy turned out fine, but didn't make it to LKML. Everyone
cc'd directly got it, but the LKML filter has a ban on the word
propasition, and being blackholed by it, I merely assumed the patch was
too large - so I split it up, and actually ended up binary searching
down to the problematic section before finding the taboo list.
_Every_ problem eventually turns into a binary search.
Zach
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
Home