Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch]: adding physdev_op to hypercall.h

To:	Muli Ben-Yehuda <mulix@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch]: adding physdev_op to hypercall.h
From:	Tristan Gingold <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:33:38 +0100
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Mon, 13 Mar 2006 08:30:44 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20060310172905.GC20733@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<200603101723.56105.Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx> <20060310172905.GC20733@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	KMail/1.5

Le Vendredi 10 Mars 2006 18:29, Muli Ben-Yehuda a écrit :
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 05:23:56PM +0100, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> > Declare do_physdev_op.
>
> What are the intended semantics of do_physdev_op?
See arch/x86/physdev.c.
It is mainly for interrupts.

Tristan.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch]: adding physdev_op to hypercall.h