|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] A question about CONFIG_SMP
On 23 Feb 2006, at 08:51, Tian, Kevin wrote:
Just a curious question, does anyone still care xen/UP? If yes, current
xen-unstable.hg
failed to build quickly after undef CONFIG_SMP since many structures
include types
defined only when CONFIG_SMP is on.
Just realize this issue when cleanup some IA64 code recently, where
CONFIG_SMP is still unstable and thus UP only.
Is there any benefit to have xen/UP? Reducing image size is the
immediate answer in my head...
It's not supported for xen/x86 at least. Dynamically adding LOCK
prefixes if the system turns out to be multiprocessor is the only
optimisation I think would be worthwhile. But really
multi-processor/core/thread is what we care about.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|