WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] A question about CONFIG_SMP

To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] A question about CONFIG_SMP
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:51:23 +0800
Delivery-date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 08:52:18 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcY4VlGd0Z3jeC1aTwy18Jvxcoih5A==
Thread-topic: A question about CONFIG_SMP
Just a curious question, does anyone still care xen/UP? If yes, current
xen-unstable.hg 
failed to build quickly after undef CONFIG_SMP since many structures
include types 
defined only when CONFIG_SMP is on.

Just realize this issue when cleanup some IA64 code recently, where
CONFIG_SMP is still unstable and thus UP only.

Is there any benefit to have xen/UP? Reducing image size is the
immediate answer in my head...

Thanks,
Kevin

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>