WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Fwd: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] skeleton frontend/backend examples and

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] skeleton frontend/backend examples and a deadlock]
From: Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 17:15:43 +0000
Cc: harry <harry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 17:17:05 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1131123986.3019.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1131123986.3019.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.8.3
Another question:

XenIDC is designed to handle indirection over the network, etc, right?  Would 
it be possible to make the indirection transparent to the guest by 
implementing it in the backend?  Or would that be the job of the frontend?

It certainly seems cleaner to me to make this as transparent to the guest as 
possible - also reduces guest complexity.

Cheers,
Mark

On Friday 04 November 2005 17:06, harry wrote:

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>