|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] HPET/PIT timer accuracy
On 29 Jul 2005, at 19:29, Ian Pratt wrote:
We're not relying on TSC synchronisation between CPUs. They
can run at different frequencies, stop in deep sleep, and so
on. But we *do* want the frequency of each one to be as
stable as possible. I'd expect to get <1ppm stability from a
crystal source at constant temperature, no problem.
I'd wager the TSC is stable and it's the HPET that's wandering...
We'll probably just have to add more damping on the re-calibration.
I haven't done any further tests to see how low the frequency of
wandering goes. Perhaps we'll find the platform timer is more stable
over e.g., 60s periods.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|