|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: x86_64 SMP support (status update)
* Keir Fraser (Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Xen makes a shadow mapping of the per-vcpu gdt in its own address
> space. This, coupled with Xen reserving the last 2 pages of GDT entries
> for itself, requires every GDT to start on a page boundary. So, even
> though per-cpu gdts are not page-aligned they must be at least one page
> in size.
ah, thanks! i should've realized that. at one point i moved the
cpu_gdt_table, and it was no longer page aligned (nor was it a page long)
and vcpu 0 wouldn't come up any longer. making sure it was aligned
and on it's own page got the first cpu going again...didn't think to
generalize that ;-)
thanks,
-chris
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] RE: x86_64 SMP support (status update), Nakajima, Jun
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: x86_64 SMP support (status update), Nakajima, Jun
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: x86_64 SMP support (status update), Nakajima, Jun
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: x86_64 SMP support (status update), Li, Xin B
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: x86_64 SMP support (status update), Li, Xin B
|
|
|
|
|