[Xen-devel] [patch] nx bit shouldn't get set when disabled

To:	"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] [patch] nx bit shouldn't get set when disabled
From:	"Scott Parish" <srparish@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 8 Jun 2005 18:06:16 +0000
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Scott Parish <srparish@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Wed, 08 Jun 2005 18:48:48 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D37200173042FECD1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D37200173042FECD1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.4.2.1i

How does the attached patch look?

sRp

-- 
Scott Parish
Signed-off-by: srparish@xxxxxxxxxx

nx.diff
Description: Text document

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Yield to VCPU hcall, spinlock yielding, Bryan S Rosenburg

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Yield to VCPU hcall, spinlock yielding, Andrew Theurer

Previous by Thread:

RE: [Xen-devel] [patch] predicate NX flag, Nakajima, Jun

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] nx bit shouldn't get set when disabled, Keir Fraser

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES