Re: [Xen-devel] xen_version hypercall

To:	Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] xen_version hypercall
From:	aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 4 Jun 2005 23:48:49 +0900
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Sat, 04 Jun 2005 14:48:01 +0000
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YBHBsXLYXQkqK/FBU5DC026MVpjCGgm7eWKZafHnMnj23wNEKuVO6YVptBfHQG9iRFG4pKbm8ZI2Og3nhy3XuswJXBMxwT/7B1Zff/fyGaeo6AWsPZb0gGlBVjPQAvZZSmt48dOW6i9dPqFrVkEBNSqVQG1Bh8zA+8cfdpW8YC0=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<f1a0cb8bf9b6ca47d5d64a65d4022ad1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<9cde8bff0506040718626cfbb5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200506041434.57195.mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <f1a0cb8bf9b6ca47d5d64a65d4022ad1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to:	aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 6/4/05, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 4 Jun 2005, at 14:34, Mark Williamson wrote:
> 
> >
> > The additional info would ideally allow the whole Xen version string
> > to be
> > pieced together, as displayed at boot e.g.
> >
> > "Xen version 3.0-devel (mwilli2@) (gcc version 3.4.2 20041017 (Red Hat
> > 3.4.2-6.fc3)) Mon May 16 15:12:17 BST 2005"
> > (like uname -a)
> >
> > Or a subset of that info.
> >
> > What do you think?
> 
> xen_version() takes a command parameter. We can extend the comamnd
> enumeration (currently the command is always == 0) to be abel to find
> out other interesting stuff.
> 

yes, i think this solution is cleaner than extending dom0-ops. i will
work on it to let it returns extraversion when id=1 first.

any other information we need, beside extraversion?

regards,
aq

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] xen_version hypercall