|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?
 
> Is there ever any more than one or two elements in the queue?
> What is the total set of functions called by the queue?
You could potentially have two, and in future possibly even three,
timeouts per domain.
> I suspect that the whole functionality of it can be replaced 
> with a couple of time variables that are checked and 
> manipulated in the timer interrupt code and a single 
> scheduler/timer routine in the generic scheduler.
What would you propose instead of an array heap? A linked list? 
Sounds daft to me.
> Not urgent, but if this is the right direction, we shouldn't 
> be layering more code on top of it (thus the suggestion of 
> deprecating it).
ac_timer seems like a perfrectly good abstraction, and I can think of no
reason to deprecate it.
Ian
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Ian Pratt
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?,
Ian Pratt <=
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
 
  
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |