|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?
 
On 23 May 2005, at 20:59, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) wrote:
 
Should ac_timer be removed and replaced by a lighter weight
mechanism, or at least its use deprecated?
 
 
 What's heavyweight about it? We can maybe slim down the interface a 
little, but we need a mechanism for managing at least an alarm timeout 
per vcpu. I don't imagine anyhting much simpler than ac_timer would 
really fit the bill.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- Re: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?,
Keir Fraser <=
 
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Ian Pratt
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Ian Pratt
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
 
  
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |