WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Interrupt levels

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] Interrupt levels
From: Nicholas Lee <nic-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 19:52:26 +1300
Delivery-date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 06:53:39 +0000
Envelope-to: xen+James.Bulpin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
I'm tracking performance on the machine I installed yesterday.

mutt running on one Xen instance, accessing via imap to another
instance, accessing via nfs the maildir in another instances, seems
little laggy when moving up and down the message index list.

Network latency seems low < 30ms on average.

So I was tracking vmstat.

On the mutt instances is seems reasonable:

[nic@shell:~] vmstat 3
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- ----cpu----
 r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in    cs us sy id wa
 0  0      0 144464      4 127748    0    0     0     0   36     6  0  0 100  0
 0  0      0 144464      4 127748    0    0     0     0   87    67  1  0 99  0
 0  0      0 144464      4 127748    0    0     0     0   90    83  0  0 100  0
 0  0      0 144464      4 127748    0    0     0     0   27    14  0  0 100  0
 0  0      0 144464      4 127748    0    0     0     0   10     7  0  0 100  0
 0  0      0 144400      4 127748    0    0     0    19   77    56  0  0 100  0


However on the dom0 instance (which doesn't run any of the above
services, just the bridge) is seems very high:

nic@stateless:~$ vmstat 3
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- ----cpu----
 r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in    cs us sy id wa
 0  0     12  10640     40  31168    0    0    17    25   94    19  0  1 99  0
 0  0     12  10576     40  31168    0    0     0    17 170616    16  0  0 100  0
 0  0     12  10616     40  31168    0    0     0     0 171948    10  0  0 100  0
 0  0     12  10680     40  31168    0    0     0     0 171134    10  0  0 100  0
 0  0     12  10680     40  31168    0    0     0     3 169175    11  0  0 100  0
 0  0     12  10680     40  31168    0    0     0    15 173097    20  0  0 100  0


Is this level of interrupts reasonable? 


This currently a UP Xen 2.8 machine with 5 domX instances running
without a large amount of load.



Nicholas


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>