Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xenctld - a control channel multiplexing daemon

[Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 14:44, Ronald G. Minnich wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> 
> > It's not so much about whether there would be an IP interface at all,
> > more about what's the lowest possible interface.  A daemon that uses the
> > domain socket interface could then export an IP interface.
> 
> another daemon would be a concern. On these slave nodes, the fewer daemons 
> the better.

Out of curiosity, why is that?  Is it the storage overhead?  Increasing
the number of processes?  Or simply just the additional administrative
headache?

> ron
-- 
Anthony Liguori
Linux Technology Center (LTC) - IBM Austin
E-mail: aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: (512) 838-1208




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel