WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] SMP guest support in unstable tree.

To: Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] SMP guest support in unstable tree.
From: Andrew Theurer <habanero@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 10:41:57 -0600
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 16:43:52 +0000
Envelope-to: xen+James.Bulpin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20041215232547.GA16409@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20041215232547.GA16409@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)
Christian Limpach wrote:

The unstable tree now includes support for SMP guests, i.e.
domains which run on multiple cpus.  SMP guests can use between
1 and 32 virtual cpus, even if the machine has fewer physical cpus.
The code is highly experimental and performance will improve over
time.

To use SMP guests:
- enable option CONFIG_SMP in the Linux 2.6 kernel config
- dom0 will boot with upto the number of physical cpus in the machine.
- domU will boot with as many cpus as has been configured by setting
 the XEN_VCPUS environment variable in xend's environment.
- the number of cpus used can be reduced by using the maxcpus= option
 on the Linux kernel command line.

   christian

This is great news, and I hope to start experimenting with this asap. I do have some questions:

Do you think there would be any room for "dedicated" cpus in a domain, like a one-to-one mapping of physical cpu to domain cpu? I am asking because I think there would be situations where (a) one would want to discretely divide a large system, in particular one with numa characteristics where one could dedicate cpus and memory close to each other and (b) perhaps in this one to one mapping, there might be less overhead of managing cpus in a domain, vs (assuming) some sort of timesharing of a physical cpu to many domains, and even more than one virtual cpu in just one domain. Anyway, I am mostly curious at this point. This is just what I have seen in the ppc/power5 world, a choice of dedicated cpus (however, if they are idle that cpu can be "shared" if desired) or virtual cpus (up to 64 I think) backed by N physical cpus.

Andrew Theurer


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>