WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] xen 2.0 testing idle_loop -and -03

To: Adam Sulmicki <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen 2.0 testing idle_loop -and -03
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:42:19 +0000
Cc: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen dev <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:45:28 +0000
Envelope-to: xen+James.Bulpin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 22 Dec 2004 12:51:55 EST." <Pine.BSF.4.61.0412221247400.53490@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> 1) extreme slowness
> >
> > Is this in DOM0 or some other domain? If it looks like I/O slowness,
> > have any network or disc microbenchmarks (e.g., net/disc bandwidth or
> > latency) got much worse?
> 
> dom0, i tried to compile kernel and it was like 10-100 times slower... but 
> I got impression that it was because the disk was heavily trashing.. it 
> seemed like the 45 out of the 65mb disappeared somewhere, and the 
> remainining 15 was just not enough to compile kernel (in fact oom-killer 
> killed my sshd twice).

'cat /proc/xen/balloon' will tell you how much memory your domain has.
You'll see the current allocation is somewhat less than the 'requested
target'. This is because the backend I/O drivers steal some kernel
address space and the RAM that was mapped in that space is freed back
to Xen. I wouldn't expect the current allocation to be more than maybe
6MB lower than the 64MB target though.

Also, what does 'cat /proc/meminfo' look like?

> >> 2) won't boot on p3 with compiled for for cyrix
> >
> > Has that ever worked? I did recently fix a problem with
> > CONFIG_X86_USE_3DNOW, so were you testing a very up to date version of
> > the repository? If you are totally stuck send me your .config and I
> > can build and test.
> 
> yeah, it worked just fine on xen 2.0 release. I could compile kernel with 
> CONFIG_MCYRIXIII and then run the same kernel on both P3 and via (with 
> some special patches). This time the kernel bombed on P3 (have not tried 
> it on via).
> 
> the repository was as of yesterday.

I'll try building with CYRIXIII selected. If that works for me then I
guess it must be something else in your config.

 -- Keir


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel