| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] A snapshot is not (really) a cow
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 02:35:49PM +0100, Peri Hankey wrote:
> Although I did get quite a lot wrong in my analysis, I come back to the
> point that as lvm2 creates additional snapshots of a the same original,
> it adds them to a list of snapshots of that original. If something goes
> wrong while a new snapshot is being added, the effect in my experience
> is pretty bad: all of the other snapshots of the same original become
> unusable and you lose control of xenU domains that have their root
> filesystems in those snapshots.
>
> There may be a bug in lvm2 in the handling of error conditions when
> adding a new snapshot. But if there are linkages between snapshots of
> the same original it is going to be pretty hard to guarantee that the
> snapshots are properly independent of each other and proof against this
> kind of snarlup.
>
> You can see what I mean if you look at the code:
As said before, this is needed to allow writes to the original and it
has to be a bug in error handling if snapshot creation failing renders
all snapshots of the same original lv unusable.
It seems to me that you have 2 options:
- fix the error handling
- create a new snapshot module which doesn't allow writes to the
original
I don't see the benefits of the 2nd option, but nobody's stopping you ;-)
christian
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home