 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] What is machine address?
| To: | Kip Macy <kmacy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] What is machine address? |
| From: | "Ronald G. Minnich" <rminnich@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:43:14 -0600 (MDT) |
| Cc: | Steven Hand <Steven.Hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chengyuan Li <chengyuanli@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 16 Sep 2004 23:43:33 +0100 |
| Envelope-to: | Steven.Hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040916113136.A99996@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <E1C7rcU-0004mb-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0409161112500.11464@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040916113136.A99996@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Kip Macy wrote: > How does Plan 9 efficiently handle a large number fragmented memory > ranges? FreeBSD can do it, but not well enough to eliminate the PA/MA > dichotomy? No, what I mean here is that Plan 9 would run with virtually contiguous ranges but physically discontiguous ranges. I can't seen any reason it won't work (yet). But hell, I have to get my corrupted receive ethernet packets fixed first :-) :-( ron |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] What is machine address?, Kip Macy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] question about PXE, Tim Freeman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] What is machine address?, Kip Macy |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Thanks everyone, Ronald G. Minnich |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
