| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-api
Re: [Xen-API] Xen-API Preview Tree
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 10:42:52AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> xen-api-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 10/08/2006 05:00:13 PM:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I have put a tree on Xenbits containing our work-in-progress regarding a
> > Xend that supports the new Xen-API. You may pull from this tree using
> >
> > hg clone http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/xen-api.hg
>
> I will supply a patch for xend to reflect the previously submitted Xen-API
> changes for vTPM support. I want to separate the vTPM support into an
> extra class for having the possibility to extend that class in the future.
How do you expect this to differ from the vTPM support in Xend today?
> After looking at the implementation it looks like virtual machine
> configurations will live on the CIM client side and through a sequence of
> create methods are going to create a VM. Is this correct?
No, not at all. VM configurations are stored on the server side -- the
appropriate details are passed in to a constructor, and then persisted by Xend
on its side. What gave you the impression that configurations would live on
the client side?
Ewan.
_______________________________________________
xen-api mailing list
xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
|
|
|
| |
|
Home