[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] paravirtualization on linux domU

  • To: xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Alberto Asuero Arroyo <albertoasuero@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 21:11:35 +0200
  • Delivery-date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 12:12:20 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=FeOZdmVXbpybx22U1ODUbwOgjB/TIDH0rNJ/jQiww5cmH9UDItEx0d8BNlmHv/JH4g emIVfgNGIz/OQr9XpTjkiB6PepvUWKY9mnLyP0+H7IBWSDyrLtcjqKwvWobARC2iQyW4 S5dt1V1tqIPMFBpS+260wWJayAucFk7S1B/oo=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>


I always have the same question...

It's possible install linux domU by  2 ways:

1) like a windows domU (using  distribution's cd or dvd and vnc)

2) with  xen-tools and xen-create-image. With this way it's necessary use a kernel with support for xen domU.

Does the option 2 use a kernel with domU support to avoid the paravirtualization?

What is the best option?why?

Thanks alberto
Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.