[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] AMD-V or VT

  • To: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Ian Murray <murrayie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
  • Cc:
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 09:11:35 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=LTIQFzAyi1u/kDCe6M8mJ7wKUB5jK+L0ibvqs00WKkXetlKF4JY5fGCYg8VhuuaAeFNgoJTyX7p+dSwYf8znRu1yOv5sbqpPj3yZuKA9BAlxblMLcfPe1XjIErodH8a6AVyWoDOabxj9ogt4LHq6F4CvSoriUqnpIZD+R6BzZng=;
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

I can't tell you the answer to that (also, define 'better', etc), but what I can tell is that it seemed to me that all mid desktop AMDs supported its virt technology, whereas with intel, it was clear that most mid-entry chips desktop-orientated chips didn't. From that I would say that Intel 'charge' you for it by forcing you to use certain chips, whereas AMD 'give it away', if you see what I mean.

From: Andrey Varsavsky <alex.faq8@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, 7 August, 2009 15:33:26
Subject: [Xen-users] AMD-V or VT

Sorry for simple question:
What techonology is better for HVM-using: VT or AMD-V. Thank's a lot if any can take answer.

Best Regards,

Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.