[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs

  • To: FranÃois Delpierre <xensource@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Ciro Iriarte <cyruspy@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:07:31 -0400
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 08:08:18 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=W+8xj9/6NrCELOBrsW+N0T+D73vXDjoF3AX//y0ETFcEMzLpAtVpy9Nan0JaJHem16 2q+GBiaeez8Q5wh35C4X1aMEnjK1hOAaLR7JcNX1tNUlCFTLxTrlvd9Iety767r6XbJP LU/uZVc4ezUW7HpTPYkwrdHqaq0tMosxlfqO4=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

2009/8/7 FranÃois Delpierre <xensource@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi,
> Quite funny. We are using Xen over iSCSI for years, and we are turning to
> Netapp NAS to migrate to NFS for the following reasons :
> - Easier setup, no matter how many xen hosts you have.
> - Avoid dealing with Cluster Filesystem. (We use OCFS2 quite successfully
> anyway.)
> - Some 3 years ago, we were using nbd + drbd + clvm2 + fenced + ... to have
> direct lvm in your VM works, but it's too complicated and too complex to
> maintain, especially if you have an issue or more than 2 dom0.
> - According to the bench I received, there is no difference in performances
> between NFS and iSCSI. There are some differences in some cases due to the
> different levels of cache.
> Regards,
> FranÃois.

Hi, was this benchmark specific to Xen?, is it public?


Ciro Iriarte

Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.