Re: [PATCH v6 05/36] KVM: x86: Add KVM_[GS]ET_CLOCK_GUEST for accurate KVM clock migration

[David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2026-07-27 at 18:15 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> 
> Can the KVM_[GS]ET_CLOCK_GUEST changes be moved to the end of the series?  The
> total size of the series doesn't scare me, I just don't want to end up with 
> all
> the fixes and cleanups stuck behind a patch that isn't a hard dependency.  
> E.g.
> AFAICT, none of the following changes, include selftests updates, actualy rely
> on KVM_[GS]ET_CLOCK_GUEST existing.

That only matters if we plan to backport them, surely? And I wasn't. 

I suspect it won't be pretty, but I can have a go at moving
KVM_[GS]ET_CLOCK_GUEST to the end. I guess in a similar vein we'd want
to move KVM_VCPU_TSC_SCALE to the end too.

Some of the selftests will have to move too, as they do use those
features.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature