[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] xen: introduce CONFIG_HAS_SHARED_INFO for archs without a shared page


  • To: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 15:26:40 +0200
  • Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=google header.d=suse.com header.i="@suse.com" header.h="Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:Autocrypt:From:Content-Language:References:Cc:To:Subject:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID"
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Teddy Astie <teddy.astie@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 13:26:53 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 03.06.2026 16:25, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> --- a/xen/common/domain.c
> +++ b/xen/common/domain.c
> @@ -320,9 +320,9 @@ void vcpu_info_reset(struct vcpu *v)
>      struct domain *d = v->domain;
>  
>      v->vcpu_info_area.map =
> -        ((v->vcpu_id < XEN_LEGACY_MAX_VCPUS)
> -         ? (vcpu_info_t *)&shared_info(d, vcpu_info[v->vcpu_id])
> -         : &dummy_vcpu_info);
> +        IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_SHARED_INFO) && v->vcpu_id < 
> XEN_LEGACY_MAX_VCPUS
> +        ? (vcpu_info_t *)&shared_info(d, vcpu_info[v->vcpu_id])
> +        : &dummy_vcpu_info;
>  }

While the change here is likely okay, it points at possible further omissions.
You've dealt with all uses of shared_info(), but you've left alone all uses of
vcpu_info() (and __vcpu_info()). Reads are presumably okay, but writes to
dummy_vcpu_info open a side channel for possible info leaks. Looking over uses
in common code, no code changes may be needed; extending the description may
be all that's wanted here.

> --- a/xen/common/event_channel.c
> +++ b/xen/common/event_channel.c
> @@ -1323,9 +1323,13 @@ int evtchn_reset(struct domain *d, bool resuming)
>          rc = -EAGAIN;
>      else if ( d->evtchn_fifo )
>      {
> -        /* Switching back to 2-level ABI. */
>          evtchn_fifo_destroy(d);
> -        evtchn_2l_init(d);
> +
> +        if ( IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_SHARED_INFO) )
> +            /* Switching back to 2-level ABI. */
> +            evtchn_2l_init(d);
> +        else
> +            evtchn_fifo_init_ops(d);
>      }

The "else" part isn't needed, is it? evtchn_fifo_destroy() doesn't undo
what ...

> @@ -1624,7 +1628,11 @@ void evtchn_check_pollers(struct domain *d, unsigned 
> int port)
>  
>  int evtchn_init(struct domain *d, unsigned int max_port)
>  {
> -    evtchn_2l_init(d);
> +    if ( IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_SHARED_INFO) )
> +        evtchn_2l_init(d);
> +    else
> +        evtchn_fifo_init_ops(d);

... was done here.

> --- a/xen/include/xen/shared.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/shared.h
> @@ -43,7 +43,14 @@ typedef struct vcpu_info vcpu_info_t;
>  
>  extern vcpu_info_t dummy_vcpu_info;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_SHARED_INFO
>  #define shared_info(d, field)      __shared_info(d, (d)->shared_info, field)
> +#else
> +void * shared_info_absent(void);

Nit: Stray blank after '*'.

> +#define shared_info(d, field) \
> +    (*(typeof(__shared_info(d, (d)->shared_info, field)) 
> *)shared_info_absent())

How about the simpler

extern struct shared_info *shared_info_absent;
#define shared_info(d, field) (shared_info_absent->field)

?

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.