[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/svm: Make vmcb_struct private to svm/


  • To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Alejandro Vallejo <alejandro.garciavallejo@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 16:23:43 +0100
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 165.204.84.17) smtp.rcpttodomain=citrix.com smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine sp=quarantine pct=100) action=none header.from=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none (0)
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=qi5qthMk8m27brwK0/AIX3bayGyenIbZaP/5taARoxI=; b=XxFwh3cg7VNz0NW3fchE2IWQKGS+B7ZD5SnU4Kr/5fWarEV+kiDX/Ji8J6JpyGsJ0CJ1Z1VavEdVpexY+MlLunEeUX/FpvrigccODNz11Ijnqpeb/PZIfRPhmc9QiHAi03U+gRY2P7vm9R4g321CBPTxLKmvWkVqSpnD6vVXLdaG4ZA/+xjXMhyfEx8gVsmNtm9xI0Y9LXRRPhO9dxu92wV4K/5TuFJlSuO8PvM8FO2ltZpmocFECKa1RDoB5ZArHLlFhhf5YCgdK7EOQdBWm9CYJHeD0mc5A/+MdBhL+z60UjaGnXTfy7j1pq6g+N/UQGC24+38v3buly7kHNPaag==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=MEZ+ah64FZaR7rGv6dUizT8AsMUuIJ81QJBJh+21qhskDnKnbN7nTRRseRKZhkxhKfAvzghNkPSclxSgTtQ/ZgKxasRyskrXZR99+/+ece6mp361+sIJycsGlbbivy5yeNMuQnjb3O+Cqa/DTXBWC0IToRSr3r7KG9MjWX0xRErrvsRE5xkeshtt4nlKCZVPgbiLN4TkVHpki4afB8XjFmqjmS+BTyZGT0tl5s4vkTTcnuJXqAUEZkQ+oqMR00VO3cyWgevcgKZQyLQxvJMFx9Zo3OoY2OEOuDaTa425tJ3qoCNsYDJWqT7NChn9TjgktuIgKO9sUZHwaHw9Ngh4ww==
  • Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Dec 2025 15:24:06 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

Hi,

Code motion is correct according to my scripts. A nit though...

On Fri Nov 28, 2025 at 9:19 PM CET, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> The rest of Xen has no buisness knowing this structure, and it is currently
> included via xen/sched.h into most code.  Create a new private svm/vmcb.h.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/asid.c             |   1 +
>  xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/emulate.c          |   1 +
>  xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/intr.c             |   1 +
>  xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/nestedsvm.c        |   1 +
>  xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c              |   1 +
>  xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svmdebug.c         |   2 +
>  xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vmcb.c             |   2 +
>  xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vmcb.h             | 617 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  xen/arch/x86/include/asm/hvm/svm/vmcb.h | 606 -----------------------
>  9 files changed, 626 insertions(+), 606 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vmcb.h
>

[snip]

> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vmcb.h b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vmcb.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..68012948a9e3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vmcb.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,617 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +#ifndef SVM_PRIVATE_VMCB_H
> +#define SVM_PRIVATE_VMCB_H
> +
> +#include <xen/types.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/x86_emulate.h>

Worth commenting here that this exists because the segment selector struct lives
as part of the x86 emulator even though it's part of the SVM ABI.

In an ideal world this wouldn't exist. Otherwise everything looks fine.

With or without the nit addressed

  Reviewed-by: Alejandro Vallejo <alejandro.garciavallejo@xxxxxxx>

Cheers,
Alejandro



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.