Re: [PATCH v6 00/16] dma-mapping: migrate to physical address-based API

[Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 06:53:52PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 10:08:21AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 12:03:27PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 12:25:38AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > This series does the core code and modern flows. A followup series
> > > > > will give the same treatment to the legacy dma_ops implementation.
> > > > 
> > > > Applied patches 1-13 into dma-mapping-for-next branch. Let's check if 
> > > > it 
> > > > works fine in linux-next.
> > > 
> > > Thanks a lot.
> > 
> > Just fyi, when dma debug is enabled, we're seeing this new warning
> > below. I have not had a chance to look into it yet, so I'm just
> > reporting the observation.
> 
> Did you apply all patches or only Marek's branch?
> I don't get this warning when I run my NVMe tests on current dmabuf-vfio 
> branch.

This was the snapshot of linux-next from the 20250918 tag. It doesn't
have the full patchset applied.

One other thing to note, this was runing on arm64 platform using smmu
configured with 64k pages. If your iommu granule is 4k instead, we
wouldn't use the blk_dma_map_direct path.