[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v12 0/6] x86: Make MAX_ALTP2M configurable
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Petr Beneš <w1benny@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 11:37:17 +0200
- Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Shawn Anastasio <sanastasio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xxxxxxx>, Bob Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@xxxxxxxxx>, Connor Davis <connojdavis@xxxxxxxxx>, Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>, Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexandru Isaila <aisaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Petre Pircalabu <ppircalabu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Christian Lindig <christian.lindig@xxxxxxxxxx>, David Scott <dave@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 09:37:36 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 11:31 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As it is still lacking ack-s, as I think I had indicated.
Sorry if it sounded like complaining - it absolutely wasn't meant that
way. I was merely explaining why I did it, since I wasn't sure what's
the "right protocol" - i.e. whether I should let the commit be
unchanged and let you do it, or - considering I'm resubmitting anyway
- whether I should make the change (despite me agreeing to let you do
it).
P.
|
