[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v9 4/8] vpci: Hide extended capability when it fails to initialize
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 12:42:31 +0200
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; bugseng.com; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=162.55.131.47
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; d=bugseng.com; s=openarc; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1753872151; h=DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:Message-ID:X-Sender:Organization:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=M+RwKOzQq/GPkLpgZxRZ7iKwsMNzgNdonb6fP3gVAVE=; b=4ZBOfTxb2+cQxtdcCgO1Eva36B/XKkgqcncZRjhyMNeMmg73/V3d+Fd0EObU4h1+2OLK f7Yryg8A88rKW9KXOi5Ypr7h/w0kvy4+Tq9hAIZSdyOy4zHLmCeo6F6ZVu1ko47QeUfyy nWc6t7KenV0dLdwQIXfw9q9S5wTs6r8CTjGwT6nUcihcJsEZP8wCdw+V+qyfbZ6wP5Qgn CJL9aMVWJZNtoRrjddyJjHOK6inqqluVnWstyEv3FKE9GuyJ+l+JmiGBmQkP2urMGc4AH 1zXRrU24BcmTMd71jgmSVYD/aO8fPn9ksXeIJB2phMqK4H+/1h0mgkyiemOqtgOsv+x7d OOA3J4h4tiqOPf1/CVHNLunC6Jq2s/4Ok55Uy8TReFBfziCSQ3uhkMX2dibnbSw19zuer TFaV8AsLodO5H4Gb3ZfhBdWgXAtn0ahmNZ8zAkqBqKRic7nxCpfC2Xt/C12RTL+Pq9KR0 e6FqXj3kY5eOCPEMTILgUAotBiQz2h+PrPR5dspgtaegjuE3q2xYOW+HQftCrjQLAD1kL 8N7Yw+JyGoMQ1KKpHVn7zdIutWvtu6NOOGLArT2o2zFxrhL/v9ZfgpoRTNaZo20EavKBm lojQfajKtm3lo/fSGggOFVfVEYVrztUgpCxcfGvyhVkr7/Qa9HV6HUZiRYrHDgw=
- Arc-seal: i=1; d=bugseng.com; s=openarc; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1753872151; b=nyiWynhwMx4nOzo7g7hlaA46cXuLHx5tEogdw8VgH/Y/XzJg0XAYIYSyPqqoeKDkHFjf wDwr38lcTZEibMzyHbNMhg7vImYv0gFRVTnce82IDBbyPMcIh83XoJG4pKbcpgUHdQ/DK nZlAPCmfvscuL1sXRj7+tjDhwq/GHphpOO6jQ5axenPqgisvas2aCZawGXJNHgTHaelGo GnwRcqddutcLIU5PlohOTQ2Hkagf3AZ76UkLRRk8FRBoU/QbqeoNH/aWxY4AIVaPI8znY HISluuzSzPc4rf1eSxcy0hixmewp1N0ccN8bgoByJuFbobyterjwJZ/e2jznD74vM/BUY LB4RvpyX651LttjclDDEmrOd8dtufiXbhcZ9VRZQtB8phvtH2Y2yE00upHcFpy5uCXJX5 IGQs6jWwes5NjUvOfbdeE1p000ZBZoaZRsGH9YVBBE3RbLrWDEs2KChoKoPa2B3ySGBJ9 IeiIt1xc+See9ubZ67N/a6qOKDyrWDRZ48p7ois02xHyJ6tcRDMY22+3FHyF1g2LqGksD OuuSppe/SHOQahMvLvcZG5IaP9Ynb4+Nzt1WkzhZ3WvE9Y2flw2ogUzgUF1CZZxXsKERr 254JC5yV4ghqWqR3sL2dp2YgTCeWa9Lh1422CN/sBot1dvIrf819W2Wmlig2Wls=
- Authentication-results: bugseng.com; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=162.55.131.47
- Cc: Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@xxxxxxx>, Huang Rui <ray.huang@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, consulting@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 10:42:37 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 2025-07-30 11:50, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 28.07.2025 07:03, Jiqian Chen wrote:
+static int vpci_ext_capability_hide(
+ const struct pci_dev *pdev, unsigned int cap)
+{
+ const unsigned int offset = pci_find_ext_capability(pdev->sbdf,
cap);
+ struct vpci_register *r, *prev_r;
+ struct vpci *vpci = pdev->vpci;
+ uint32_t header, pre_header;
+
+ if ( offset < PCI_CFG_SPACE_SIZE )
+ {
+ ASSERT_UNREACHABLE();
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ spin_lock(&vpci->lock);
+ r = vpci_get_register(vpci, offset, 4);
+ if ( !r )
+ {
+ spin_unlock(&vpci->lock);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ header = (uint32_t)(uintptr_t)r->private;
+ if ( offset == PCI_CFG_SPACE_SIZE )
+ {
+ if ( PCI_EXT_CAP_NEXT(header) <= PCI_CFG_SPACE_SIZE )
+ r->private = (void *)(uintptr_t)0;
Eclair regards this a Misra rule 11.9 violation. Elsewhere we use (void
*)0,
which I then would conclude is "fine". But I can't say why that is.
Cc-ing
Bugseng for a possible explanation.
Hi Jan,
I only see
0|$ git grep "(void\*)0"
xen/include/xen/types.h:#define NULL ((void*)0)
which is fine for R11.9 of course. As Andrew noted, I don't see the need
for the use of uintptr_t either.
--
Nicola Vetrini, B.Sc.
Software Engineer
BUGSENG (https://bugseng.com)
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nicola-vetrini-a42471253
|